Lesley Goldberg
New documents claim horses were underfed, improperly trained and regularly tranquilized in order to keep them docile.
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo! Unlike 95 percent of the known universe, I was thrilled by last season?s finale of THE KILLING. [...]
Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thetvaddict/AXob/~3/HexOwVaIxH0/
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!
Philiana Ng
William Mapother will appear in the sixth episode of the new season, premiering June 14 on USA Network.
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!NET 8PM 8:30PM 9PM 9:30PM 10PM 10:30PM ABC Missing Grey’s Anatomy Scandal CBS The Big Bang[...]
Read The Full Article:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thetvaddict/AXob/~3/4eRjSmV0pRs/
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!"Misfits" star Lauren Socha is leaving the popular Channel 4 teen drama and will not return for the fourth season. According to BBC, the BAFTA winner was sentenced to four months in prison after she admitted to racially aggravated assault on a taxi driver.
Channel 4 said in a statement that the arrest and Socha's departure from the series are not related.
"A mutual decision was reached between Clerkenwell [Films, which produces "Misfits"] and Lauren earlier this year that she would not be returning for the fourth series," Channel 4 said in a statement.
The fourth season of "Misfits" -- which airs on Hulu in the US and has an American remake in the works with "The OC's" Josh Schwartz and original series creator Howard Overman -- was planned to launch in late 2012. Socha isn't the only original cast member exiting the series. Both Antonia Thomas and Iwan Rheon have left the series.
"You know what? Without sounding disrespectful, 'Misfits' is 'Misfits,'" Socha told The Huffington Post via phone about the potential American version. "We've won the BAFTA. I've got a BAFTA. We don't need to prove to anyone else. Obviously, they're going to take it to a higher level, with a production team and stuff like that. If America wants to try and smash it, they can, but at the end of the day, they've got 'Shameless' and 'The Office' over there. Competition is absolutely nothing because with English telly, you start with something and then you leave it as that. And I think it's going to be very difficult to try and get a job as Kelly in America. She's so distinctive! I'm impossible to play! Good luck to it, though. I think I'll be a bit gutted, but let's see what they do."
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!The Avengers has a double dose of Chrises - Hemsworth and Evans, that is - in their pack, and I chatted with the guys at a press day for the movie. They revealed that they loved sharing the spotlight after having their own individual movies, and also discussed what they hope to see next from Thor and Captain America. Check it out!
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!
Lesley Goldberg
The actor tells THR that his character on ABC's political fixer drama makes his drug kingpin character on Showtime's "Weeds" seem like a puppy dog.
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!NEW YORK — Mick Jagger will test his comic chops later this month as host of the "Saturday Night Live" season finale.
The Rolling Stones frontman has been a musical guest twice before on the long-running NBC show, and the network said Thursday he will perform musically on the May 19 finale. But he has never been host before, a job that usually requires participation in several comic skits.
The Rolling Stones mark their 50th anniversary as a band this year, but have yet to announce any activities to commemorate the occasion.
Jagger last year put out a disc as part of a group called SuperHeavy, which also included reggae singer Damian Marley and former Eurythmics founder Dave Stewart.
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!Ashton Kutcher -- what were you thinking, dude?
I know it's hard to stay grounded when you're constantly surrounded by celebrities and security. But what part of you thought it would be a good idea to put on "brownface" and play a creepy would-be Bollywood producer named Raj, making dubious use of a video dating service, all in the interest of selling PopChips? I have a sneaking suspicion that you don't need the money. Or the potential cringing of Demi Moore when she sees you in an ad that's based on the idea of you as a single man looking for love in all the wrong places? And in some offensive faces. As tech entrepreneur Anil Dash wrote in his blog, "If you find yourself putting brown makeup on a white person in 2012 so they can do a bad 'funny' accent in order to sell potato chips, you are on the wrong course."
I saw the controversial segment of the ad -- which has now been pulled -- on a Today show segment this morning which reported on the outcry from Indian-American groups after it first ran. I felt so embarrassed for all concerned -- Kutcher, anyone named Raj, all the Indian people I've ever met, the guy who invented TV -- that I almost left the room to get away from the mishegoss.
But then I wondered if I might be the pot calling the kettle brown. See, my novel, Other Waters, is about Indian-Americans and the conflict they feel as a result of being bicultural. It's written in the third person, but it's a close third, largely written from the point of view of the protagonist, Maya Das, an Indian-American psychiatrist who thinks that her family has been cursed. The book hasn't generated any outcry from Indian-American readers. In fact, it's gotten a fair amount of praise from some of them, such as Michelle d'Mello, who wrote in the Bamboo Online, "The ultimate twist is that Ms. Gage, who writes with such authenticity about the 'desi' experience is not, herself, South Asian."
So what's the difference between me and Ashton? We both "pretended" to be Indian in a way, so how come I'm an author who gets a pass for her "authenticity" and he's just a big, fat racist? (OK, no one is calling him big and fat. He's a handsome, buff racist, but he is being called a racist nonetheless.)
And I'm not the only non-South-Asian author to write from an Indian perspective. Nell Freudenberger's new book The Newlyweds also has a South Asian woman as its protagonist and a white woman as its author. (I have yet to read the book but am eager to; I went to college with the author and met her a few times and she seemed wicked smaht, as I used to say when I was growing up, even then.) In a review of The Newlyweds in the New York Times' Book Review, Mohsin Hamid wrote:
At stake here isn't -- or shouldn't be -- the question of authenticity, which is a red herring: nationalities, ethnicities, genders and even species do not 'own' the right to fictional narratives spoken in what purport to be their voices... No, the more pressing issue is that of verisimilitude, truthlikeness, the illusion of being real, a quality without which fiction that adheres to the conventions of what is commonly called realism (a problematic term, but useful shorthand for the more cumbersome 'let's try not to draw attention to the fact that this is all made up'-ism) starts to feel to its audience like an ill-fitting and spasmodic sock puppet.
So are we not big, fat racists, or literary colonialists because our stories seem "truer" than Kutcher's bad accent, phony complexion and cheap achkan jacket? Or are all three of us just embarrassingly on-trend and everyone wants to be Indianish these days? When does something stop being an homage and start being a stereotype?
I don't think these questions have easy answers. But I suspect the media involved (TV versus novels) has something to do with the distinction between exploring another culture and mocking it. Maybe it has to do with the time needed to produce a novel as opposed to an 18 second piece of an ad. But I think it also has to do with the amount of time it takes to read a novel rather than to watch an ad.
When the Pulitzer committee failed to give a prize for fiction this year, novelist Ann Patchett (one of my favorite authors) wrote, "Reading fiction is important. It is a vital means of imagining a life other than our own, which in turn makes us more empathetic beings. Following complex story lines stretches our brains beyond the 140 characters of sound-bite thinking, and staying within the world of a novel gives us the ability to be quiet and alone, two skills that are disappearing faster than the polar icecaps."
I couldn't agree with Patchett more. She wrote her op-ed weeks ago, so she clearly wasn't commenting on the "Raj Upset." (Although she is right on point with her disdain of Twitter -- Kutcher got into hot internet water when he tweeted to protest the JoePa firing, without being aware that a child abuse scandal was involved, and the backlash to the Raj ad has largely played out on Twitter.) But I think she couldn't be more right about empathy, and, to extend her thought, I suspect that one of key differences between stereotype and characterization is the act of taking time to imagine what a person -- and the ethnic group they identify with -- feels. As readers we are forced to imagine what it's like to be someone else. As viewers, it's all too easy to laugh at a person as you would at a cartoon character. It's the difference between trying to get inside someone's mind, and just slapping on their makeup.
Maybe this experience will cause Kutcher to slow down and take some time to think before he tweets or applies foundation that doesn't complement his skin tone. Maybe he'll even take up longer-form writing, extending his range beyond 140 words. And if he does find himself with time on his hands, I've got a few good novels I could recommend.
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!"Last night when I was feeding the kids spaghetti, I realized that my mother had made it for me, and that her mother had made it for her. And I got this picture in my head of her becoming me, like with one of those movie dissolves... I realized you could take it all the way back to cave men...and then the future." -- Megan Draper, Mad Men, 1966
Much of this episode was about growing up, and all the cycles (both good and bad) we experience through our parents and pass on to our children. That idea fits the "Generation Gap" theme developing this season, but it also strings the older and younger characters together as part of one complex, volatile circuit. In this episode, there are three grandmothers (Pauline Francis, Marie Calvet, and Katherine Olson), eight mothers (those three, plus Joan, Peggy, Megan, Alice Geiger the Heinz Wife, and Mona Sterling) and six children (Sally, Bobby, Megan, Peggy, Glen, and Cynthia, whose father gives Don a bitter lesson about biting the hand that feeds you -- something children do almost every day.) And let's not forget the moment when Megan plays a reverse role, tucking her own mother into bed and picking her burning cigarette out of her hand as if it were a stray toy.
So what does this have to do with the costumes? A lot, it seems.
Add to del.icio.us
Digg this
Post to Furl
Add to reddit
Add to myYahoo!
Powered by blogdig.net